Scores and Comments

19.c.ps.101.018

Application Details
Proposal Type	General Program Support - Discipline-Based
Request Amount	$40,000
Total Score	464.000
Average Score	92.800

Panelist	Excellence	Impact	Management	Accessibility	Total
Andree Dale	37	29	20	10	96
Davis Tenaj	40	30	20	10	100
Jenkins David	37	25	19	9	90
Klein Kathleen	38	30	17	8	93
Schnell Adam	33	27	16	9	85

Comments
Andree Dale - Score: 96.000
The grant materials are excellent and articulate every aspect of their project clearly.This is a company that is committed to its mission and to realizing it.
Davis Tenaj - Score: 100.000
perfect example!
Jenkins David - Score: 90.000
Very well-written, clear, cogent, and enlightening narrative. I am very excited to hear about the site-specific free performances and your artistic vision and passion behind them. GREAT list of partnerships, and I applaud your inclusion across disciplines. Solid specificity in how your organization directly impacts LH. Clear evaluation plan. This is a very solid proposal, one comment for you (and pretty much every other applicant) is just a suggestion to cite your support materials in the narrative to pique adjudicator interest and contextualize your narrative claims. I love your website!
Klein Kathleen - Score: 93.000
Excellent company! Collaborative efforts with other organizations Fabulous press
Schnell Adam - Score: 85.000
While I applaud the efforts of this organization, this application lacked focus and clarity. I understand that you have many programs, but it was very difficult to figure out what the organization was all about. In this case detail, both within the application, and within the support materials, did not lend to understanding or readability. The first half of the application seemed also to have suffered from a lack of proofreading.